Currently there is a
scandal about a banker with his submissive girlfriend, of course the media
labels it a real life 50 Shades, to be honest that is a good thing, because it
means they are possibly not going to get dragged through the dirt as much as in
the past.
I have no clue what
happened, apart from what the gossip rags said, and we all know that they won’t
let facts get in the way of a good story, but by all accounts, it just sounds
like another relationship that has gone sour, if it wouldn’t be for the BDSM
aspect, nobody would give a damn about it. There are tons of relationships that
go sour every day, police gets called in because things escalate a bit, it
happens but you don’t read about it in the papers.
This one seems to be a
bit more restrained than the usual stuff, maybe because it’s a dominant and
successful male and the general public is more inclined to sympathize with him
being a bit kinky and “masculine”?
I’ve seen people label
her as a victim who “endured all that pain”, well sorry, it was a BDSM
relationship, I have a hunch that she might have enjoyed the pain, there are
male and female masochists around and it doesn’t seem that the whippings are
what caused the blow up, it seems it was that he strayed and found somebody else.
So take out the BDSM stuff and it’s just a run of the mill breakup and the
party who’s left behind gets angry. Nothing fucking newsworthy about it.
Happened to a friend
of mine, only the scumbag left her with 3 small kids and a mortgage, dodged
support payments and decided to start again with a young girl he knocked up.
Chances are he’s going to leave her as well when the novelty wears off, but
that’s her problem, getting involved with somebody who was in a relationship –
duh, if he does it to somebody else for you, chances are he’ll do it for you,
floors me how people can’t really figure that one out…
Anyway, she was
struggling and almost lost her home, guess what? Wasn’t newsworthy because it’s
far too common, guess if she would have thrown a whip or a pair of handcuffs in, it would have been different... /Sarcasm off
With what happened in
the publicized breakup, I’m not freaking taking sides, maybe she was a pain to
live with, maybe she just couldn’t deal with him breaking up with her, maybe he
was playing around and was an ass about it – who the fuck knows and unless you
are friends with them and know the inside story, why take sides?
It’s enough that a
relationship has gone sour, common stuff that happens every day, just let them
deal with it on their own. Why splash their faces all over the media?
Yes, the guy might
have had pictures of him and tons of pretty women up on his site, he didn’t
make a big secret of his life-style, nor did she, but then in fairness, she’s a
fetish model, but that doesn’t mean that he wanted his clients to see the pics,
and for them to discover it, they would have to have the same interest.
Completely different story to some gossip rags exploiting it so they sell a few
more papers.
To be honest, I hope
that all his clients go “What a stud” and that his business thrives, and I hope
she is getting lots and lots of model work due to the exposure, it would make
up for being dragged through the media.
And kudos to them for not talking to
the media or giving statements! Let them starve, they aren’t publicity hungry
celebs playing it out for PR reasons, they are private people who’s private
lives are getting dragged through the mud!
For those who go “Oh
well, but it’s BDSM and they went to parties” – oh yeah, so what? I mean how
would anybody like it to see glorious details of their relationship being
splashed all over the news? You know stuff like that you only do it in the
missionary position, that your encounters only last minutes and all that shit.
It’s just nobody’s business…
Oh and I hope that all
the pictures were copyrighted and somebody is going to sue those rags for using
them!
I just saw that she talked to the media - how crazy is that? I mean the NY Post? Doesn't she realize that they are just going to gobble her up and spit her out?
Though there is one thing, the whole thing is a bit less vicious than usual, I think it does have to do with the success of 50 Shades and with the fact that more and more people are open about being at least interested in BDSM. It's a bit harder for the media to paint us all as freakazoids and dirty perverts, when a lot of us lead perfectly normal lives, just with a bit of spice, and fetish clothes and a bit of whipping or bondage, is it really so much different from wearing sexy lingerie and foreplay? The women who have read 50 Shades and had a case of damp panties, and the husbands and boyfriends who benefited from the arousal of their spouses and might have experimented with a bit of BDSM themselves, they are less inclined to see us all some type of sex-crazed subhumans, so yes, something is won by being less hidden. Because people tend to fear what they don't know, if they learn about BDSM, they realize there really is nothing to fear and it's all consensual...
Another news flash, the lady in question maintains that she never spoke with the NY Post and the whole interview is a fabrication... Quite shocking, unless you remember it's a Murdoch paper and they didn't mind hacking private phones, parents of soldiers who lost their lives in Afghanistan, so they could have 1st hand pictures about the shock, politicians, celebs, you name it... Wouldn't be the first time the Murdoch empire forgets all about ethics, mind you they don't seem to remember much about journalism anyway.
Let's hope the latest 2 victims take them on and that they make an equal amount of money as Max Mosely made!
In case you see an edition of the NY Post anywhere, just email their advertisers and tell them why you won't buy their products anymore, the NY Post won't be around for long with out advertisers...
I just saw that she talked to the media - how crazy is that? I mean the NY Post? Doesn't she realize that they are just going to gobble her up and spit her out?
Though there is one thing, the whole thing is a bit less vicious than usual, I think it does have to do with the success of 50 Shades and with the fact that more and more people are open about being at least interested in BDSM. It's a bit harder for the media to paint us all as freakazoids and dirty perverts, when a lot of us lead perfectly normal lives, just with a bit of spice, and fetish clothes and a bit of whipping or bondage, is it really so much different from wearing sexy lingerie and foreplay? The women who have read 50 Shades and had a case of damp panties, and the husbands and boyfriends who benefited from the arousal of their spouses and might have experimented with a bit of BDSM themselves, they are less inclined to see us all some type of sex-crazed subhumans, so yes, something is won by being less hidden. Because people tend to fear what they don't know, if they learn about BDSM, they realize there really is nothing to fear and it's all consensual...
Another news flash, the lady in question maintains that she never spoke with the NY Post and the whole interview is a fabrication... Quite shocking, unless you remember it's a Murdoch paper and they didn't mind hacking private phones, parents of soldiers who lost their lives in Afghanistan, so they could have 1st hand pictures about the shock, politicians, celebs, you name it... Wouldn't be the first time the Murdoch empire forgets all about ethics, mind you they don't seem to remember much about journalism anyway.
Let's hope the latest 2 victims take them on and that they make an equal amount of money as Max Mosely made!
In case you see an edition of the NY Post anywhere, just email their advertisers and tell them why you won't buy their products anymore, the NY Post won't be around for long with out advertisers...
No comments:
Post a Comment